The Agony Of Neutrality, An Objective Lesson
Michael Hedges October 16, 2017 Follow on Twitter
Public broadcasting executives fall into two distinct groups. Many are lifers, sealers of the mission, steeped in the culture, occasionally blinded by it. Others are the change agents, coming in from outside the organization with new ideas or, at least, less baggage. More often than not, politicians have a large voice in selections, vacillating between staying the course or changing it. With the nature of media as it is in the 21st century, change is the first choice.
The BBC’s director of news and current affairs James Harding is changing jobs at the first of the new year, leaving the BBC “to start a new media company with a distinct approach to the news and a clear point of view,” said his statement, quoted by the Guardian (October 10). “I know I will enjoy the chance to do some more journalism of my own and, at such a critical time, I’m seriously excited about the prospect of building a new venture in news.” Details, he said, would be forthcoming.
It is common - to the point of expected - that the top jobs at public broadcasters go to those attached to journalism and news production. BBC general director Tony Hall fits this with nearly 30 years in a BBC newsroom, including five years a Director of News. He also burnished those culture credentials with more than a decade revitalizing the Royal Opera. Lord Hall isn’t leaving soon.
That may well have encouraged Mr. Harding to exit sooner rather than later. UK media watchers observed unanimously no internal (or external) issues forcing him out the door. He has, they say, done a good job, only a few missteps. The BBC is huge; TV and radio channels, online portals, production studios and international broadcaster BBC World Service with its various branches. A YouGov poll last year showed the 58% of the UK population viewing BBC News as “balanced and unbiased.” Sky News placed second with 15%. (See more about the BBC here)
The other quite obvious exit starter is basic to all mid-career executives: what’s next? Mr. Harding is 48 years old and seems to cycle through executive positions about every five-years. Almost five years at the BBC followed five years as editor at the Times and 12 years (three jobs) before that with the Financial Times. In 2008 he wrote a book - Alpha Dogs - about political spin-masters. His GB£ 340,000 annual salary (roughly US$450,000) pales compared with that of ITV news chief Michael Jermey and Sky News head of news John Ryley. Both of them are but a few years older than Mr. Harding, neither contemplating an exit.
Everybody not currently living in a cave knows “point of view” is the news business growth sector. This leaves public broadcasters adhering to the last century’s code of conduct feeling a bit out of step. Why keep to objective facts (AKA: truth) when “alternative facts” (AKA: spin) attract viewers, readers, listeners and, it follows, money? Why let the tabloids (or the Russians) have all the fun?
In the UK, Conservative Party MPs has long been on the watch for false steps by the BBC, real or fantasized. Failure of BBC News to unsufficiently support the exit from the European Union (Brexit) by pointing out critical deficiencies is their most common complaint. And with the possibility of Sky News becoming a Fox News clone becoming more tenuous, struggling Conservative leaders, MPs and their friends need a reliable voice. Mr. Harding, in his exit statement, said his new media venture would cover what the BBC “can’t, and probably shouldn’t, do.”
See also in ftm Knowledge
The BBC
Few pure media brands transcend borders and boundries to acheive the iconic status of the BBC. The institution has come to define public service broadcasting. Yet missteps, errors and judgment questions fuel critics. The BBC battles those critics and competitors and, sometimes, itself. 155 pages PDF (August 2015)
Order here
Public Broadcasting - Arguments, Battles and Changes
Public broadcasters have - mostly - thrown off the musty stain of State broadcasting. And audiences for public channels are growing. But arguments and battles with politicians, publishers and commercial broadcasters threatens more changes. The ftm Knowledge file examines all sides. 168 pages PDF (March 2014)
Order here
|
Hot topics click link for more
Every crisis is an opportunity for the world’s authoritarian rulers. Removing critical voices enhances their positions, they believe. Jailing reporters and editors is easy, like chasing away media support organizations. The real bonus for dictators is closing publishers and broadcasters.
Transitional media environments create considerable froth among top executives. The hardest-charging eventually want to “seek new opportunities” or are asked. Stability is a warm-fuzzy memory as audiences, platforms and owners change. Growth - however possible - is still the priority. Getting there is the journey, not the destination.
The digital age has changed everything; trite, now, but still true. Broadcasting and publishing are so last century, when engaging each individual customer was considered déclassé. The media sphere is now strictly retail; apps as aisles, clicks and swipes the points-of-purchase. Stars are now showcases, changing regularly, and headlines point to the check-out line. It’s a different business every day.
|
advertisement
Media in Spain - Diverse and Challenged – new
Media in Spain is steeped in tradition. yet challenged by diversity. Publishers hold great influence, broadcasters competing. New media has been slow to rise and business models for all are under stress. Rich in language and culture, Spain's media is reaching into the future and finding more than expected. 123 pages, PDF. January 2018
Order here
The Campaign Is On - Elections and Media
Elections campaigns are big media events. Candidates and issues are presented, analyzed and criticized in broadcast and print. Media is now more of a participant in elections than ever. This ftm Knowledge file reports on news coverage, advertising, endorsements and their effect on democracy at work. 84 pages. PDF (September 2017)
Order here
Fake News, Hate Speech and Propaganda
The institutional threat of fake news, hate speech and propaganda is testing the mettle of those who toil in news media. Those three related evils are not new, by any means, but taken together have put the truth and those reporting it on the back foot. Words matter. This ftm Knowledge file explores that light. 48 pages, PDF (March 2017)
Order here
More ftm Knowledge files here
Become an ftm Individual or Corporate Member to order Knowledge Files at no charge. JOIN HERE!
|
|