followthemedia.com - a knowledge base for media professionals
Big Business
Recently in Big Business

Wings over Bulgaria
...Emmis International announced its Bulgarian expansion...

Is There Anyone Out There Who Still Thinks This Is All Cyclical?
A media analyst for Credit Suisse put the cat among the pigeons...

Liquidity, liquidity, come, please, to my door
The final billion euro media deal of the year...

AGENDA

All Things Digital
This digital environment

Big Business
Media companies and their world

Brands
Brands and branding, modern and post

The Commonweal
Media associations and institutes

Conflict Zones
Media making a difference

Fit To Print
The Printed Word and the Publishing World

Lingua Franca
Culture and language

Media Rules and Rulers
Media politics

The Numbers
Watching, listening and reading

The Public Service
Public Service Broadcasting

Show Business
Entertainment and entertainers

Sports and Media
Rights, cameras and action

Spots and Space
The Advertising Business

Write On
Journalism with a big J

Send ftm Your News!!
news@followthemedia.com

CNN Not Hot In Israel

It’s a classic capitalistic battle – the supplier wants at least as much if not more for a product, and the customer values it at much less than had previously been paid. The supplier in this case is CNN and the customer is HOT, Israel’s largest cable company, and the stalemate that even saw Parliament getting in the act as moderator saw CNN dumped Thursday.
followup(0) comment(1)

CNN logoBut negotiations being negotiations, and hardball being hardball, that doesn’t mean it is the end of the story, but for now – at least as this is being written -- HOT has replaced CNN with arch-rival Fox on its analog system.

The Knesset’s (Parliament) Economic Committee got into the act earlier in the week in trying to help sort things out, and what was said about CNN gives some pause for thought about the influence of the cable news network within a country, indeed globally.

Knesset member MK Avshalom Vilan explained, “While the Knesset cannot force HOT and CNN to come to an agreement, it is important for them to know that this is an issue which greatly concerns the public as two-thirds of all television subscriptions are with HOT. It would make the country look bad for its largest cable provider to not carry CNN.”

The  much smaller YES cable system has CNN, and the Council for Cable and Satellite Broadcasting ruled earlier this year, in a not so subtle government hardball move of its own,  that should HOT not continue its CNN contract then HOT subscribers could cancel their subscriptions without penalty.

ftm background

There’s A Lot More to That Story About CNN Dumping Reuters
In the TV news agency business there is a common expression – “dropping one’s pants” -- and it refers to the spirited competition between Reuters Televsion and AP Television News over which one will drop its pants lower financially than the other in order to win new business or retain an existing customer who says “We’re going down to one agency” and then lets the two financially fight it out.

Citizen Journalists Help Tell The Virginia Tech Story
Watching the tragedy at Virginia Tech unfurl via CNNI has brought home how important civilian journalists have become to the telling of breaking news on television.

It Used To Be Media News Agencies Were the Wholesalers and Broadcasters Were The Retailers. Now Each Wants Their Cut of the Other’s Pie
First it was Reuters that decided there was much more money to be had by being in the media news retail business rather than just being the news wholesaler supplying products to those news organizations that deal directly with the public. Now CNN and ABC are turning the tables and making video available via a third party, Yahoo, in addition to their own web sites.

Happy 25th Birthday, CNN!!
A Personal Remembrance of The Lengths Salesman Ted Turner Had To Resort To Flog His Fledgling News Network To A Cable Industry That Did Not Want It

For media business negotiators what a fabulous chess match to watch. One really  would love to be the fly on the wall on both sides. On the one hand there is HOT that says it is determined to lower the prices it pays to its channels by some 30 – 40%. And in the face of either accepting much less, or getting dumped, most suppliers faced with that choice have succumbed. But  not CNN, perhaps in its thinking that it has such an influence in the country that HOT would not dare ban it. So now the battle lines are really drawn.

The Knesset Committee thought it had helped things along a bit when it got CNN to agree to extend its current contract by 10 days so there could be more time for negotiations. But HOT surprised just about everybody by cutting the service Thursday morning, basically saying that CNN had indicated there wasn’t going to be any price cut so what was the point of continuing service for another 10 days.  Hardball is hardball.

According to Dov Abramowitz, CNN legal representative and lead CNN negotiator, as told to The Jerusalem Post, “Last Wednesday night, HOT representatives called and essentially told us that if we didn’t immediately agree to their demands in the new contract, they were going to take the channel off the air beginning Thursday afternoon.

“CNN is disappointed as it feels that it has a special relationship with Israel and we have something unique to offer the Israeli public.”

HOT said it did make one last attempt by inviting CNN’s business boss for the Middle East to make a last ditch offer. “The decision to end our contract with CNN comes after the network’s chief executive in the Middle East region, Ron Cionne, refused to come to Israel to negotiate with us,” according to HOT’s VP of marketing.

Yossi Lubaton added, “We feel they never  took seriously the negotiations and did not make an offer reasonable enough to allow us to enter into serious negotiations.”

CNN claims that it made many offers – apparently the best financial one being that the contract renews at the existing rate – but HOT made clear it was looking for at least a 30% reduction.

So, what should CNN do in such a situation? Well the government decision earlier in the year basically provides the way forward. On its web site CNN should have a notice addressed to Israeli viewers taking note that the service is no longer available on HOT but it is available on YES and it should stress the government’s earlier decision that a HOT contract can be canceled without penalty if CNN was so dropped. Hardball, after all, begets hardball. When the BBC was also under HOT threat it organized a letter-writing campaign by HOT subscribers.

None of that really costs  CNN any money, but if it wanted to put some marketing funds into this campaign – and it should for the final outcome with HOT will be watched very closely by cable systems around the world  – then a few newspaper ads saying the same thing wouldn’t hurt either.

There has already been so much bad blood spilt in public in Israel that CNN doesn’t really have to worry itself about “upsetting” its former client. Haaretz quoted a CNN spokesperson saying, “For years, CNN has cooperated with HOT and reduced its prices. But this has become a vicious cycle of threatening demands on HOT’s part. We’ve reached the point where we can no longer provide a service, we cannot cover costs, and are losing money. It’s simple business logic.”

The truth is that a supplier has to put a value on the product being supplied. There are always negotiations and give and take, but the supplier still has that basic value for the product and if the customer  insists on not accepting that then one has to walk away. CNN, after all, recently dumped news supplier Reuters when they could not agree to its terms. Déjà vu.

There is something of a love-hate relationship with CNN in Israel. The network’s power and influence around the world is accepted so there is great sensitivity to the stories that CNN produces from the region. For Middle East audiences you’re either “with us” or “against us” – there is no middle ground so when a news organization produces reports that tries to treat all sides equally then it is in an almost no-win situation. That’s one explanation why a frequent seen Israeli bumper sticker reads, “CNN Lies”.

HOT says it has been successful in reducing prices from other cable suppliers, although those suppliers hotly dispute their reductions were in the 30 – 40% range that HOT claims, but one thing is clear for all -- no matter how much HOT has saved on supplier costs over the past couple of years none of that has trickled down to subscribers in the form of lower rates.

So maybe subscribers should sayeth unto HOT as HOT sayeth to its suppliers: “Lower our rates or you’re gone!”


ftm Follow Up & Comments

Post your comment here

On November 2, 2007 Moshe Chertoff news addict Kibbutz Shomrat, Israel wrote:

I'm a HOT digital subscriber. We, HOT 's subscribers, the two-thirds of Israel's television subscribers, must be their real financial concern.
 
Therefore, I'm trying to muster support for a call-in effort as protest to bring CNN back to HOT. If enough of us call in our disagreement, we can tip the scale of finances. We must make it clear to HOT that if we can't see a wide variety of news sources as their subscriber, we do have an alternative (the YES satellite network). As the world's #1 news provider, CNN gives us the most reporters around the globe of any network. We find out the fastest about what's going on anywhere from CNN.

Poor HOT?

Just to give you an idea of HOT 's profits (so you shouldn't feel sorry about their paying so much for CNN), in 2003, they were still MATAV Cable Systems and "reported gross profit of NIS 78.8 million (US$18.0 million) compared with a gross loss of NIS 11.9 million (US$2.7 million) for 2002." "Gross profit for the quarter more than doubled to NIS 26.3 million (US$6 million) from NIS 12.8 million (US$2.9 million) in fourth-quarter 2002."— http://sec.edgar-online.com/2004/04/01/0001178913-04-000409/Section2.asp  Since then, they merged with the other two remaining cable providers in Israel to create a very profitable cable monopoly.
True, I'm a news addict, and want to know as much about everything and anything as I can (as presented on TV), and know that not everyone is like me. I'm guilty of having most of my family in Los Angeles and expecting to watch live reports about earthquakes, riots, fires, or landslides. My kibbutz has been under missile attack from Iraq and Lebanon and I want to see what the world is viewing about it. I have a son in the army, yet also feel for the "other side" in the conflict. (The only two sides in the conflict really are those who realize we will eventually live in harmony with our neighbors, and those that will always refuse to accept that fact—Jew or Arab). I have family and friends around the world and am concerned also for them. I'm would like to have access to both CNN and Al-Jazeera!
 
CNN International doesn't show only the nationalist American view like FOX, only the view of the British Empire's like the BBC, or only the nationalist Israeli view like our channels 2 and 10. I find a wealth of (limited) information in short portions in CNN International's programming, however much their reports are not a "full" or "entirely fair" representation of the problems or situations.
 
There is no single pill to take to get it all. So let me choose what I want to swallow.

copyright ©2004-2007 ftm partners, unless otherwise noted Contact UsSponsor ftm