followthemedia.com - a knowledge base for media professionals
Sports & Media
AGENDA

All Things Digital
This digital environment

Big Business
Media companies and their world

Brands
Brands and branding, modern and post

The Commonweal
Media associations and institutes

Conflict Zones
Media making a difference

Fit To Print
The Printed Word and the Publishing World

Lingua Franca
Culture and language

Media Rules and Rulers
Media politics

The Numbers
Watching, listening and reading

The Public Service
Public Service Broadcasting

Show Business
Entertainment and entertainers

Sports and Media
Rights, cameras and action

Spots and Space
The Advertising Business

Write On
Journalism with a big J

Send ftm Your News!!
news@followthemedia.com

Malta Unites As Broadcasting Authority Opens World Cup Finals

Don't tell Sepp Blatter or he'll invent a new fee. World Cup 2006 fever is forcing media, regulators and rights holders to give the public what it wants. Look how quickly digital TV and mobile TV is appearing. Even “old” TV problems are fixed, too. Best of all, there are gems of wisdom coming from this fast, under-pressure thinking.

Maltese football fans have been in despair for weeks over deeply felt injustice: a cable TV company purchased the broadcast rights and created a special premium channel for sports, meaning an additional fee. Despair, as it does, turned to outrage. The stage following public outrage is, of course, government meetings.

The Malta Broadcasting Authority (BA) met and decided. Invoking the European Commission (EC) Television Without Frontiers Directive (TVWF) the BA ordered the cable company – Melita Cable – to make available “final stages” of the 2006 World Cup to free-to-air TV as part of their public service obligation. Exactly which free-to-air channel or channels to broadcast some or part of the football finals is yet to be determined. Maltese are even wondering what is meant by “final stages.”

ftm background

CeBIT Gizmo-fest: Search for the Next Big – or Small – Thing
Five long years after the bubble burst the consumer technology sector is regaining its confidence and CeBIT is the place to show and glow.

Unless FIFA Climbs Down on Its World Cup Internet Coverage Restrictions It Will Pop The Cork Off That Bottle Called “The Power of the Press” And That Is The Very Last Thing That FIFA’s Commercial Sponsors Will Want to Experience
FIFA owns the World Cup competition and says the media must play by its rules and accept that no game pictures can go on the Internet until a match is over.

With Global Sales of Mobile Phones Set to Reach 1 Billion This Year, and 3G Carriers Fighting It Out To Launch Their TV Services First With World Cup Coverage, Is This The Year We Really Use the Phone for More Than Just to Say Hello?
Deals are beginning to be signed In Europe for mobile phone operators to enter the TV business in a big way. In the UK, Virgin Mobile has signed up for BT’s Movio system with the hope one of the five terrestrial TV stations on offer will have World Cup coverage. But Deutsche Telekom’s T-Mobile, a World Cup sponsor, is in talks with FIFA to see if it can show England games live, or at the very least highlights.

The World Cup Effect: Extra Fee For Football Infuriates Maltese
Welcome to Sport Year 2006. Nothing will top it. There’s the Winter Olympic Games coming right up. Then, like the 900-pound gorilla, the football World Cup blocks out all else for millions of listeners, viewers and internet cruisers. Already plans are being set for all day, all week or all month football attention.

Malta adopted TVWF in 2000 as part of its accession treaty with the European Union. In its rule making the Broadcasting Authority advised the EC that World Cup football matches are events of national importance, as they are in virtually all Member States. Invoking these rules, the BA explained that exclusive broadcast rights holders – in this case Melita Cable – must respect all obligations under law, meaning that a substantial portion of the public cannot be denied the event – in this case World Cup football finals.

The BA intends the ruling to create “a reasonable balance between the interests of the televiewers and today’s economic realities resulting from a harsher competition in the distribution of television rights”.

Maltese TV is rather unique. There are five free-to-air channels; one is owned and operated by the Church, two owned and operated by the leading political parties, one is a commercial channel – Smash TV – and one is the public service channel.

PBS – the public channel – took the blunt edge of early criticism when the public (read:license fee payers) asked why it did not buy the rights. That softened when it was revealed that PSB could not match the Melita Cable bid for the rights. Last week PBS dropped EuroNews for financial reasons. One observer referred to PBS as “insolvent.”

All of this has led to unusual unity of the two major political parties – the Nationalists and Labour – for football on free-to-air TV. The Nationalists, editorializing in the Times of Malta, dump squarely on the European Union:  “This is happening after Malta joined the EU when standards were supposed to continue rising and when the ways of bygone eras would be gone forever.”

But it was Labour Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Joseph Muscat, speaking in Strasbourg, who placed the larger issue squarely in front: “So far digital television has practically only meant that consumers are made to pay for services that were up to now available for free.”



ftm Follow Up & Comments

copyright ©2004-2006 ftm partners, unless otherwise noted Contact UsSponsor ftm