followthemedia.com - a knowledge base for media professionals
Write On
AGENDA

All Things Digital
This digital environment

Big Business
Media companies and their world

Brands
Brands and branding, modern and post

The Commonweal
Media associations and institutes

Conflict Zones
Media making a difference

Fit To Print
The Printed Word and the Publishing World

Lingua Franca
Culture and language

Media Rules and Rulers
Media politics

The Numbers
Watching, listening and reading

The Public Service
Public Service Broadcasting

Show Business
Entertainment and entertainers

Sports and Media
Rights, cameras and action

Spots and Space
The Advertising Business

Write On
Journalism with a big J

Send ftm Your News!!
news@followthemedia.com

It’s Not Every Day A Swiss Newspaper Prints A Story Confirming CIA Secret European Prisons and Says Damn the Consequences, and Its Not Every Day That The Swiss Army’s Prosecutor And The Attorney General Open Separate Leak Investigations That Could Cost An Editor and Two Reporters Up To Five Years in Prison

The big story in Europe before Christmas was that the CIA operated clandestine prisons in eight European countries where it was questioning Al-Qaeda suspects and secretly flew the prisoners through European air space. Condoleezza Rice basically confirmed to European governments there had been clandestine flights, but “What prisons?” and the host governments named said, “No way.”
Go To Follow Up & Comments

So it comes as a bit of an embarrassment when a Swiss newspaper has now printed the contents of a fax intercepted by the Swiss intelligence services last November from the Egyptian Foreign Ministry to the Egyptian embassy in London that confirmed the presence of such American secret prisons and that 23 Iraqis and Afghans had been interrogated at the Mikhail Kogalniceau base in Romania. It said there were other such prisons at bases in Ukraine, Kosovo, Macedonia, and Bulgaria. All the named countries had denied the presence of such prisons.


 

 

 

 

 

 

Guess who's listening?

Now tiny Switzerland, from where this web site is produced, seldom finds itself embroiled in such international scandals. The Swiss are neutral observers, with obvious biases, on the world scene and embarrassing information is usually kept pretty quiet here, about at the same noise level as snow falling on the Matterhorn, and that’s the way people like it.

But now suddenly they find themselves thrust into the middle of a European-US spat because, and this is difficult to believe because Swiss officials are famous for keeping their mouths shut, someone at a very high level with access to very sensitive material, actually leaked to a newspaper! In Washington there would be amazement if there were not at least one good leak a day; Switzerland is not Washington. This kind of leak just isn’t done.

Putting the politics and embarrassments to one side for a moment, from a media perspective what actually happened before and after publication of the documents in the Sonntags Blick newspaper gives an interesting insight on how freedom of the press works here.

Once the leaked document fell into the newspaper’s hands – it isn’t saying how – there were meetings between the newspaper and the Swiss government, according to editor-in-chief Christoph Grenacher.  The government reminded the newspaper that it was against the law to publish military secrets and also that telling the world that the Swiss have the capability to intercept satellite faxes might not be in the country’s best interests. The Swiss also said how embarrassing the fax could be to those governments that have denied the presence of such CIA prisons, and embarrassing to Switzerland itself for letting such information get out.

ftm background

Vanity Fair Claims A Big Exclusive Revealing the True Identity of “Deep Throat”; That Is NOT Where the Kudos Should Go – They Belong to The Washington Post For Protecting Their Source These Long 30 Years
Sometimes journalism can be very cruel to itself. The Washington Post honored its agreement with W. Mark Felt that it would not name his as “Deep Throat” – the secret source who confirmed many of the details in the Post’s Watergate coverage that eventually ended with the resignation in disgrace of Richard Nixon as President of the United States in 1974. Yet a phone call from a lawyer representing Deep Throat’s family two years ago to Vanity Fair asking if they would buy the story eventually gave the magazine its “exclusive.”

The Newsweek Debacle: Whatever Happened to the Rule That Before Something Got Printed It Had Two Reliable Named Sources?
Ever since the global revulsion to the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq the media has been aware that particularly in the Moslem world they take their religion and customs very seriously, and when American wrongdoing towards Moslems is uncovered it’s going to cause very serious consequences. That doesn’t mean that such events should not be reported, but it does mean extra care needs to be taken to ensure such reporting is correct.

US Broadcasting Agencies Under Investigation
After meeting for three days at an undisclosed location the US Corporation for Public Broadcasting board accepted the resignation of former chairman and current board member Kenneth Y. Tomlinson. This week Tomlinson will appear before a Congressional subcommittee investigating Arabic television channel Al-Hurra. Tomlinson currently chairs the Broadcasting Board of Governors, which oversees all US government overseas media programs, including Voice of America and Al-Hurra television.

It’s Not So Easy Being a European Public Broadcast Executive These Days. Was It Ever?
One EU investigation ends as another begins, budgets are cut, laws are changed, not to mention strikes, and let’s not forget the occasional blasphemy charge.

Piramida TV’s Strange Weekend
Reports differ slightly, but it appears Kyrgyzstan is about to lose its only marginally independent television station. And it appears fueled by hostilities between those in and out of power.

But the government officials never denied the authenticity of the document, nor did they go to court to attempt a pre-publication ban.

At the end of the day the newspaper decided to publish and damn the consequences. “We published the paper because we put human rights on a higher interest level than the interests of our own secret service,” Grenacher said in a radio interview. Swiss law protects journalists from being forced to divulge their sources.

But once published, everything really did hit the fan! The next day the Army’s chief prosecutor started an investigation for publishing a document that had been marked secret by the secret service; the attorney general who already had started an investigation into whether there had been secret CIA flights through Swiss airspace expanded the investigation to the leaked document; the Swiss cabinet denounced the leak and a Parliamentary sub committee told the government to take action.

“Acting like this strikes a blow at the reputation and credibility of our country and is an offence,” a government spokesman said.

Swiss law prohibits the publication of secret documents with a prison sentence of up to five years and/or a fine, but no one has ever served time for such an offense.

While the newspaper refused to say how it came by the document there is growing suspicion of a rift within the Swiss secret services between those who support US policies in Iraq and those who do not, and someone in the “does not” camp gave the document out.

What is a somewhat annoying to some politicians, though, is that the document was intercepted November 15, just three days after the 46-nation Council of Europe asked Swiss senator Dick Marty to investigate what has become known as the CIA Affair. Yet the intercepted document was never made available to Marty.  Perhaps another example of Swiss neutrality.

Romanian Prime Minister Calin Popescu, meanwhile still strongly denies such prisons had existed in Romania. He has invited Sonntags Blick reporters and also European Commission experts to Romania to investigate the alleged locations.

Not that they would have much to see. Many European politicians believe that before Secretary of State Rice came to Europe in December to try and defuse the situation all the prisons had been closed so that she could say there were no such camps. “It’s not like Guantanamo Bay,” Marty told a Swiss media conference this week. “It’s more like empty rooms where people have been interrogated or tortured or taken somewhere else,” he said.

Marty, meanwhile, said he was personally convinced that the CIA had run secret prison operations in Europe, but he has yet to come up with absolute proof. He said his investigation needs at least another 12 months to complete.


ftm Follow Up & Comments
see original article

Military Court Acquits Swiss Journalists - April 19, 20007

A military court has cleared three Swiss journalists of publishing information taken from a Swiss Secret Service document concerning CIA secret flights in Europe and prisoner camps in several countries in a case that attracted international attention. The court awarded each of the defendants 20,000 francs (€12,400, $16,500) for their troubles. The prosecution, none too happy, said it was considering an appeal.

The defense claimed the information published had already been in the public domain. The “secret” document, the defense claimed, had been found under a seat on a train. The defendants for their part said they did not recognize the court’s authority. No word yet on whether they will recognize the compensation.

Switzerland is the only European country in which a military court can put civilians on trial. International journalistic organizations and human rights groups have urged Switzerland to stop that practice.

The Swiss cabinet was embarrassed when it became known last year that the Swiss Secret Service had intercepted a fax between Cairo and the Egyptian embassy in Bern concerning CIA prisoner flights in Europe and CIA prison camps hosted by several countries. Embarrassed, that is, not by the fact they had made the interception but rather that it became known that the Secret Service had the capability to do such things.  Swiss authorities later confirmed that six of the CIA flights had landed in Switzerland.

Swiss Journalists To Go On Military Trial For Divulging CIA Secrets From A Swiss Secret Service Document - April 16, 2007

Three Swiss journalists are to go on trial in a military court Tuesday on charges stemming from their reports in the Sonntags-Blick newspaper stemming from a Swiss Secret Service document that gave information about the existence in Europe of secret prisons run by the CIA, and the secret transport of CIA prisoners in Europe.

The International Federation of Journalists and other journalist groups are condemning the military proceedings and say that at the very least the hearings should be before civilian courts. Chairman Arne König of the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) explained, “It is ironic that in the host country of the Geneva Convention, journalists are being charged by a military court for reporting human rights abuses. This is not the first attempt to intimidate investigative journalists in Switzerland and keep them from publishing anything that the government would rather keep secret.”

According to the EFJ, the special status of the Swiss military justice system and its ability to try civilians is unique in Europe and contravenes the United Nations Human Rights Act which Switzerland ratified five years ago.

Last year a journalist was sentenced to 20 days in jail for writing about weakness in the construction of a military bunker. Several other journalists have been fined up to 700 Swiss francs (€435, $560) for other critical military articles.

Facing trial are Cristoph Grenacher, editor-in-chief, and Sandro Blotz and Beat Jost.

copyright ©2005-2007 ftm partners, unless otherwise noted Contact UsSponsor ftm