followthemedia.com - a knowledge base for media professionals | |
|
AGENDA
|
||
It’s Not Every Day A Swiss Newspaper Prints A Story Confirming CIA Secret European Prisons and Says Damn the Consequences, and Its Not Every Day That The Swiss Army’s Prosecutor And The Attorney General Open Separate Leak Investigations That Could Cost An Editor and Two Reporters Up To Five Years in PrisonThe big story in Europe before Christmas was that the CIA operated clandestine prisons in eight European countries where it was questioning Al-Qaeda suspects and secretly flew the prisoners through European air space. Condoleezza Rice basically confirmed to European governments there had been clandestine flights, but “What prisons?” and the host governments named said, “No way.”
|
ftm background |
Vanity Fair Claims A Big Exclusive Revealing the True Identity of “Deep Throat”; That Is NOT Where the Kudos Should Go – They Belong to The Washington Post For Protecting Their Source These Long 30 Years The Newsweek Debacle: Whatever Happened to the Rule That Before Something Got Printed It Had Two Reliable Named Sources? US Broadcasting Agencies Under Investigation It’s Not So Easy Being a European Public Broadcast Executive These Days. Was It Ever? Piramida TV’s Strange Weekend |
But the government officials never denied the authenticity of the document, nor did they go to court to attempt a pre-publication ban.
At the end of the day the newspaper decided to publish and damn the consequences. “We published the paper because we put human rights on a higher interest level than the interests of our own secret service,” Grenacher said in a radio interview. Swiss law protects journalists from being forced to divulge their sources.
But once published, everything really did hit the fan! The next day the Army’s chief prosecutor started an investigation for publishing a document that had been marked secret by the secret service; the attorney general who already had started an investigation into whether there had been secret CIA flights through Swiss airspace expanded the investigation to the leaked document; the Swiss cabinet denounced the leak and a Parliamentary sub committee told the government to take action.
“Acting like this strikes a blow at the reputation and credibility of our country and is an offence,” a government spokesman said.
Swiss law prohibits the publication of secret documents with a prison sentence of up to five years and/or a fine, but no one has ever served time for such an offense.
While the newspaper refused to say how it came by the document there is growing suspicion of a rift within the Swiss secret services between those who support US policies in Iraq and those who do not, and someone in the “does not” camp gave the document out.
What is a somewhat annoying to some politicians, though, is that the document was intercepted November 15, just three days after the 46-nation Council of Europe asked Swiss senator Dick Marty to investigate what has become known as the CIA Affair. Yet the intercepted document was never made available to Marty. Perhaps another example of Swiss neutrality.
Romanian Prime Minister Calin Popescu, meanwhile still strongly denies such prisons had existed in Romania. He has invited Sonntags Blick reporters and also European Commission experts to Romania to investigate the alleged locations.
Not that they would have much to see. Many European politicians believe that before Secretary of State Rice came to Europe in December to try and defuse the situation all the prisons had been closed so that she could say there were no such camps. “It’s not like Guantanamo Bay,” Marty told a Swiss media conference this week. “It’s more like empty rooms where people have been interrogated or tortured or taken somewhere else,” he said.
Marty, meanwhile, said he was personally convinced that the CIA had run secret prison operations in Europe, but he has yet to come up with absolute proof. He said his investigation needs at least another 12 months to complete.
ftm Follow Up & Comments
see original article
A military court has cleared three Swiss journalists of publishing information taken from a Swiss Secret Service document concerning CIA secret flights in Europe and prisoner camps in several countries in a case that attracted international attention. The court awarded each of the defendants 20,000 francs (€12,400, $16,500) for their troubles. The prosecution, none too happy, said it was considering an appeal.
The defense claimed the information published had already been in the public domain. The “secret” document, the defense claimed, had been found under a seat on a train. The defendants for their part said they did not recognize the court’s authority. No word yet on whether they will recognize the compensation.
Switzerland is the only European country in which a military court can put civilians on trial. International journalistic organizations and human rights groups have urged Switzerland to stop that practice.
The Swiss cabinet was embarrassed when it became known last year that the Swiss Secret Service had intercepted a fax between Cairo and the Egyptian embassy in Bern concerning CIA prisoner flights in Europe and CIA prison camps hosted by several countries. Embarrassed, that is, not by the fact they had made the interception but rather that it became known that the Secret Service had the capability to do such things. Swiss authorities later confirmed that six of the CIA flights had landed in Switzerland.
Three Swiss journalists are to go on trial in a military court Tuesday on charges stemming from their reports in the Sonntags-Blick newspaper stemming from a Swiss Secret Service document that gave information about the existence in Europe of secret prisons run by the CIA, and the secret transport of CIA prisoners in Europe.
The International Federation of Journalists and other journalist groups are condemning the military proceedings and say that at the very least the hearings should be before civilian courts. Chairman Arne König of the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) explained, “It is ironic that in the host country of the Geneva Convention, journalists are being charged by a military court for reporting human rights abuses. This is not the first attempt to intimidate investigative journalists in Switzerland and keep them from publishing anything that the government would rather keep secret.”
According to the EFJ, the special status of the Swiss military justice system and its ability to try civilians is unique in Europe and contravenes the United Nations Human Rights Act which Switzerland ratified five years ago.
Last year a journalist was sentenced to 20 days in jail for writing about weakness in the construction of a military bunker. Several other journalists have been fined up to 700 Swiss francs (€435, $560) for other critical military articles.
Facing trial are Cristoph Grenacher, editor-in-chief, and Sandro Blotz and Beat Jost.
copyright ©2005-2007 ftm partners, unless otherwise noted | Contact Us Sponsor ftm |