followthemedia.com - a knowledge base for media professionals
Fit To Print

Tensions Rise On Press Regulation Plans

Newspaper publishers have long presented themselves as guardians of truth and freedom. In truth, they are in the business of selling newspapers, whether by investigating the wicked or titillating on page three. Politicians see a better world when the news media chases UFOs rather than them or their friends. The public, sadly, is often quiet.

tension stress painIn mid-March British politicians burnt the midnight oil, literally, to draft a press regulation scheme “underpinned” by a Royal Charter. Newspaper publishers were, mostly, horrified and several went on to draft their own less restrictive plan a month later, also under a Royal Charter. Reconciling the two competing plans could take years, possibly the underlying intention.

In its common modern usage, a Royal Charter in the UK distinguishes a loose set of individuals from a legal entity of some importance, not to be confused with articles of incorporation. Cities, universities and charities are recognized with Royal Charters. The Bank of England has a Royal Charter. Professional groups, from accountants to zoologists, have Royal Charters. The UK’s public broadcaster BBC has a Royal Charter, renewable every ten years.

Royal Charters in the UK are slightly more than symbolic gestures, rules set out can only be amended by the Privy Council, formally advisors to the Queen and mostly senior politicians, in effect representing the UK Parliament. Press regulation in the UK became a political issue after revelations of phone-hacking and allegations of bribing public officials linked, largely, to publisher News International, owned by News Corporation, and illuminated by a lengthy judicial inquiry that recommended “independent self-regulation” with more muscle than the dismissed Press Complaints Commission. The Privy Council will meet May 15th in regular session to take up the competing proposals.

The Parliamentary proposal, shaped by popular antipathy toward the phone-hacking misery and related political interest, would prevent amendments to the Royal Charter for newspapers without two-thirds agreement from both Houses of Parliament. Newspaper publishers hated this, saying it would lead to political interference. Newspaper publishers and editors would be precluded from vetoing members of the new regulatory, according to the government proposal, to prevent a “fox in the henhouse” situation. Obviously, the newspaper people weren’t pleased with this, either.

Under the government plan the new regulator could force newspapers to apologize for grievous harm to citizens, dictating specific placement and language of apologies. The newspaper publishers ditched that idea along with a whistleblower hotline for journalists who had been asked to break the law or take an ethical leap. A forced apology, said the newspaper publishers, would violate their human rights. Several international media watchers, including the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), expressed concerns about the direction of press regulation in the UK. The Committee to Protect Journalists called the government proposal “counter to bedrock principles of a democracy.”

If the new regulatory system seemed to be failing its independence, according to the government’s solution, a recognition panel could step in for “serious breaches.” Newspaper publishers limited those “breaches” to acts by journalists. The alternative proposal was put forward by News International, Associated Newspapers, Telegraph Media Group, Express Newspapers and Trinity Mirror with little input from publishers of the Guardian, the Independent and the Financial Times. Regional publishers weren’t thrilled by the government plan, calling it expensive, and appear to favor a separate alternative.

The Chartered Institute of Journalists (CIoJ), a rather low profile organization, expressed fears over its own Royal Charter and remains “totally opposed to any state involvement in the enforcement of professional ethics, “ said its president Charlie Harris, quoted by the Guardian (April 30). “In a free society a press under state control is a far greater danger than a press out of control.”

The aforementioned publishers have mounted a public relations campaign with their own lobbying group – the Free Speech Network – and sponsoring poorly contrived astro-turf polls claiming support for their cause. Supporters of tighter controls over UK newspapers haven’t given up, either. Whether Prime Minister Cameron will further compromise or give it up is yet to be seen.


See also in ftm Knowledge

Press/Media Freedom - Challenges and Concerns

Press and media freedom worldwide is facing challenges from many corners. As authoritarian leaders impose strict control over traditional and new media with impunity, media watchers have concerns for democracy. This ftm Knowledge file accounts the troubles of this difficult decade. 88 pages. PDF (December 2011)

Order here


ftm resources

related ftm articles:

Deconstructing The Power Of The Press And Other Book Deals
For the news media to speak truth to power assumptions are that power – and the powerful – are not coagulated with those speaking, lest confusion reign. Power may be the ultimate social force, bigger than money and often more fun. But confusion is a force unto itself when sown carefully into the fabric.

The Proprietors Come Forward
There is an obsession in many circles with that select set of individuals who principally own big media companies. Some are reclusive and others thrive on attention. Few are at a loss for opinion on the way the world works and, certainly, the way it affects their business. And they do like things to be the way they want them.

Murdoch Agonistes
The hourly revelations, charges and retorts about News Corporation have rapt the media world. Rupert Murdoch is facing, arguably, his greatest challenge. The seeds run deep and, as is said, one reaps what one sows.


advertisement

ftm Knowledge

Media in Spain - Diverse and Challenged – new

Media in Spain is steeped in tradition. yet challenged by diversity. Publishers hold great influence, broadcasters competing. New media has been slow to rise and business models for all are under stress. Rich in language and culture, Spain's media is reaching into the future and finding more than expected. 123 pages, PDF. January 2018

Order here

The Campaign Is On - Elections and Media

Elections campaigns are big media events. Candidates and issues are presented, analyzed and criticized in broadcast and print. Media is now more of a participant in elections than ever. This ftm Knowledge file reports on news coverage, advertising, endorsements and their effect on democracy at work. 84 pages. PDF (September 2017)

Order here

Fake News, Hate Speech and Propaganda

The institutional threat of fake news, hate speech and propaganda is testing the mettle of those who toil in news media. Those three related evils are not new, by any means, but taken together have put the truth and those reporting it on the back foot. Words matter. This ftm Knowledge file explores that light. 48 pages, PDF (March 2017)

Order here

More ftm Knowledge files here

Become an ftm Individual or Corporate Member to order Knowledge Files at no charge. JOIN HERE!


copyright ©2004-2014 ftm partners, unless otherwise noted Contact UsSponsor ftm