followthemedia.com - a knowledge base for media professionals
Fit To Print

“Bittersweet, Great Experience, But Time To Move On” – Another New York Times Institutional Investor Admits You Just Can’t Win Against The Two-Class Share System

Scott Galloway achieved more than his institutional investment rivals – he at least got a seat on the New York Times Company board – but now he is giving up the ghost of trying to change things at the Gray Lady and he is stepping aside. And, oh yes, while he was there his financial stake in the company took a dive, too.

bitter sweetThe bottom line is that no matter how much Wall Street hates the two-class share system it has yet to find a way of beating it. The New York Times Company continues to tell Wall Street it is welcome to invest, but not to manage the company.

For a while there back in 2008 it seemed there was a crack in the NYT armor. It agreed to add two directors that it didn’t want to its board because the private equity funds they represented had bought some 19% of the A shares – the family owns around 88% of the B shares that actually controls the company.

So Harbinger Capital Partners and Firebrand Partners proposed that James Kohlberg and Firebrand founder Scott Galloway become two new voices on a board expanded to 15 of which the Ochs/Sulzberger family held nine seats. Their purpose, they said at the time, was to help the company develop “the optimal capital structure and a path for transforming The New York Times from a low growth company to a robust firm that is both the newspaper of record and the most trusted starting point on the Internet.”

The newcomers said at the time they did not dispute the dual share system that gave  control to the families (they really would have loved to have dumped it, but there was no way they could), but they said they also wanted to see the company become far more active in digital businesses and get out of poorly producing investments. Two examples of what to do were selling the company’s 17.5% share of the Boston Red Sox baseball team and also to sell their new Manhattan headquarters building and then lease it back.

Well, the company did put up its Red Sox stake for sale but as of yet no buyers at the price the company is willing to accept, and it did indeed sell its headquarters and lease it back. It has announced that next year it will be putting up a pay wall of sorts on its Web site, it has cut back on costs by reducing staff, and, oh, yes, it agreed to pay 14% interest on a $250 million loan from Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim.

But apart from that Web charging, there was no Web expansion along the lines the hedge funds had suggested. They had wanted the company to own second-to-none Web sites in such areas as travel, fashion, and classified advertising and they didn’t particularly care if that were done via organic growth or by buying up properties. They didn’t think much of print opportunities, although they understood the print newspaper was a no-go area, but since newspaper web sites take in more than one-third of all Web traffic then that was where they figured the NYT could expand its visibility and profits. But that never really happened.

And the white flag is now hoisted. Galloway has announced that he will not stand for re-election to the board at its April general meeting although James Kohlberg remains. Galloway’s Twitter said all that really needed to be said, “Bittersweet, great experience. But time to move on.” The two hedge funds have been reducing their stake ever since the company hit a historic $3.49 low last February – it has since bounced back to $10.75 – but their original $500 million investment is probably down to about half that today.

Harbinger and Firebrand tried to do what Morgan Stanley Investment Trust had tried but failed to accomplish beforehand – have some sort of say in how the New York Times Company is managed. It, too, finally gave up that ghost and sold out its 7.2% stake. 

At the time of the Harbinger/Firebrand investments, then Goldman Sachs media analyst Peter Appert  said in a note, “We do not see an easy or quick fix to what ails the company (and industry), other than continued investment to drive a migration of revenues and earnings to Internet-based operations.” But in an obvious reference to previous funds hitting their heads on the Sulzberger wall, he added, “It’s not clear to us what Harbinger and Firebrand bring to the table to address this challenge.”  That has now been answered -- nothing.

In the past couple of years the NYT Company has been concentrating on keeping its financial head above water which is why the company a year ago agreed to pay 14% interest on the $250 million Carlos Slim loan. But now tongues are wagging that maybe Slim bought something more – editorial silence on negative Slim stories which other media outlets are covering studiously.

There’s currently a big complicated court battle involving US banker J.P. Morgan, and the two largest Mexican telecom companies, one of which is owned by Slim. The comments and testimony so far put the bank and Slim’s company in a particularly dim light. Yet while the likes of Reuters, The Wall Street Journal, and The Christian Science Monitor and others have given prominent coverage to the case there has been nothing in the NYT print newspaper or its web site. Bloggers are rightly asking, “How come”?

Well, it’s not 100% so. While it’s true there’s no staff or agency reporting of the court case in the news pages -- and it is a legitimate question why not -- the issue does gets prominent coverage on the NYT’s Carlos Slim Archive page. Do an NYT archive search on Slim and it takes you to his page in “Times Topics”. Look at the middle column titled, “Headlines Around the World” and here are the top four linked headlines as of Wednesday, probably automatically generated via word search, all from non-NYT sources: “The Biz Story the NYT Ignored”, “Is The NYT Ignoring a JP Morgan Bombshell Because It Makes Investor Carlos Slim Look Bad?”, “The Story the New York Times Won’t Touch”, and “Mexico: Cellphone clash of Titans”.

A perfect example showing when one goes for automation instead of editors that you may get exactly what you don’t want.

 

 


related ftm articles:

There Are Still 'Good News' Stories About the Newspaper Industry, It’s Just That There’s Not So Many As There Once Were And You’ve Got To Look A Little Harder To Find Them
When a major publishing house such as Hearst announces that it’s investing some $60 million on new printing facilities for one of its metropolitan newspapers It’s the kind of news that sends a big positive message to Wall Street, Main Street, and, yes, even the folks who work on newspapers who by now must be getting pretty demoralized over all the bad news continually out there.

The Financial Message To Newspapers: Increase Your Digital Investments As Quickly As Possible
It’s beginning to look like Wall Street thinks there may be some value to owning newspaper shares, not for their print activities but for all the financial advantages of building various web businesses. And the quicker newspaper companies do that, the more that will find favor with the financial people.

Sacrebleu, Le Monde Journalists Strike To Protest Proposed Job Losses, But Do They Really Believe, Given Huge Losses, They Can Attract New Investment Without Giving Up Control?
There’s a conflict in basic economics going on at Le Monde. The journalists went on strike for 24 hours Monday to protest recommended job losses that would stem the flow of red ink and make the company profitable in a couple of years; they have rejected increased investment that would mean losing their financial control, but more new money with the inmates still running the asylum is just fine. Désolé mesdames et messieurs, but newspaper economics just don’t work that way anymore.


advertisement

ftm resources

no resources posted as of February 25, 2010->->


ftm Knowledge

Media in Spain - Diverse and Challenged – new

Media in Spain is steeped in tradition. yet challenged by diversity. Publishers hold great influence, broadcasters competing. New media has been slow to rise and business models for all are under stress. Rich in language and culture, Spain's media is reaching into the future and finding more than expected. 123 pages, PDF. January 2018

Order here

The Campaign Is On - Elections and Media

Elections campaigns are big media events. Candidates and issues are presented, analyzed and criticized in broadcast and print. Media is now more of a participant in elections than ever. This ftm Knowledge file reports on news coverage, advertising, endorsements and their effect on democracy at work. 84 pages. PDF (September 2017)

Order here

Fake News, Hate Speech and Propaganda

The institutional threat of fake news, hate speech and propaganda is testing the mettle of those who toil in news media. Those three related evils are not new, by any means, but taken together have put the truth and those reporting it on the back foot. Words matter. This ftm Knowledge file explores that light. 48 pages, PDF (March 2017)

Order here

More ftm Knowledge files here

Become an ftm Individual or Corporate Member to order Knowledge Files at no charge. JOIN HERE!


copyright ©2004-2010 ftm partners, unless otherwise noted Contact UsSponsor ftm