followthemedia.com - a knowledge base for media professionals
ftm Tickle File

 

 

The Tickle File is ftm's daily column of media news, complimenting the feature articles on major media issues. Tickle File items point out media happenings, from the oh-so serious to the not-so serious, that should not escape notice...in a shorter, more informal format.

We are able to offer this new service thanks to the great response to our Media Sleuth project in which you, our readers, are contributing media information happening in your countries that have escaped the notice of the international media, or you are providing us information on covered events that others simply didn't know about. We invite more of you to become Media Sleuths. For more information click here.

Week of October 20, 2014

Broadcasters want digital debate ended
“significant negative impact”

Since its earliest days, the end-game for proponents of the digital audio broadcasting (DAB) platform has been shutting down FM transmission. It was presented as inevitable, just like shutting down analogue television. “The future is digital,” has been the commonly offered simplistic reasoning. Many broadcasters, typically in the private sector, put up resistance, however unsteady. Everybody wants to be on the side of the future.

“Radio is already digital,” said German private broadcasters association VPRT radio chairman Klaus Schunk to the Munich Medientage conference. “The debate on the future of radio must include all platforms and devices that listeners use.” Private sector investment in radio broadcasting is “endangered,” he said, by continued “shut-down debate” over the FM platform. (See VPRT statement here – in German) VPRT members have turned their digital attention toward multi-platform chip-set solutions for smartphones.

Herr Schunk also called for limits to the “cut-throat competition” from public broadcasters. “Politicians must keep in mind the significant negative impact on the private radio market.” (See more about media in Germany here)

The internet is not just for cheap phone calls
“The power to tax is the power to destroy”

The Hungarian government is set to impose a tax on internet usage, about €0.50 per gigabyte in a country where the average monthly salary is less than €800. Economy Minister Mihaly Varga laid out the proposal to parliament this week as part of a bigger plan to balance the budget, raise taxes or something. The bare-bones, all that has been available, shows internet service providers (ISPs) paying the Hungarian tax man, presumably passing it on to customers. Hungary’s biggest telecom Magyar Telekom saw an immediate drop in its share price on the news.

“A growing number of people make phone calls over the internet,” explained Minister Varga. Typical data traffic in Hungary could push the potential tax revenue to €600 million, said Deutsche Welle (October 22). Of course, internet access allows far more than cheap telephone calls. In June the Hungarian Parliament passed tax legislation on advertising revenues widely seen as an attempt to throttle foreign commercial television operators not under ideological control of Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s ruling right-wing Fidesz Party. (See more about media in Hungary here)

After howls and wails from internet users – including 100,000 Facebook page supporters of a Sunday (October 26) protest – Fidesz MPs, still favoring the tax, made noises about placing the tax pressure exactly where they want it. “We are recommending strict measures so that the telecom tax cannot be passed on in any form to non-business subscribers,” said Fidesz spokesperson Antal Rogán, quoted by portfolio.hu (October 22). “The tax payable on traffic generated by private individuals will need to be paid at the expense of the service providers’ own profit.” Magyar Telekom is principally owned by Deutsche Telekom.

“Unilateral internet taxes are not a clever idea,” said European Commission (EC) vice president for Digital Agenda Neelie Kroes, who leaves office at the end of the month, to the Financial Times (October 21). After winning the latest round of local elections for Fidesz, PM Orban said he’s building an “illiberal democracy.” Shortly thereafter the United States Department of Justice banned six unidentified Hungarians “either engaging in or benefiting from corruption” from entering the US.

TV channel may change name to shed news image
That’s entertainment

Historic Serbian media brand B92 could disappear from television, reported Belgrade tabloid Blic (October 21), quoting unnamed sources. Founders and managers didn’t quite deny that the TV channel will be known as OTV from the first of the year saying only “the public will be informed” of any changes. News-talk radio station B92, originally B2, notably challenged the regime of the late former Yugoslav dictator Slobodan Milosevic from the early 1990’s.

In November 2010 long term shareholders Media Development Loan Fund (MDLF), now known as Media Development Investment Fund, and NCA Media exited as Swedish investor East Capital merged its interest with Greek proprietor Stefanos Papadopoulos to form Astonko as principal owner. The B92 Trust comprised of founders holds a minority interest and, according to covenants at the time, editorial control. Since the ownership change B92 TV has slowly but steadily increased emphasis on entertainment programming.

Starting as an opposition radio station, the B92 brand grew into television, internet distribution, production and music. The B92 radio station, apparently, will not be affected by the change and the B92Info cable TV channel will continue as a news channel. (See more about media in Serbia here)

Media watchers have long suggested hanky-panky in the 2010 ownership change, particularly the interest of Mr. Papadopoulos, who owns TV Macedonia. Serbia’s Commission for Protection of Competition began an investigation at the end of August into whether or not a relationship exists between Mr. Papadopoulos and Greek media house Antenna Media Group, which has principally owned Serbian TV channel Prva Srpska Televizija since the end of 2009. Antenna Media Group manages TV Macedonia for Mr. Papadopoulos.

“Impertinent” news popping up everywhere
another digital dividend

Just when the furor about the arrival of Netflix in France, comes now to the Fifth Republic Vice News, described in Le Figaro (October 20) as “impertinent.” For starters Vice News is producing a Monday through Friday quarter-hour segment - Le Point Quotidien - airing on public TV channel France 4. A staff of six in Paris will create French-language material, also available on YouTube, and translate archive goodies.

The union representing French public TV journalists cried foul at the “privatization of public service information.” The SNJ “demanded” the broadcaster use only union member journalists for news programs. France Télévisions is disparate to get young people tuning in to France 4. (See more about media in France here)

“Like most people, we are groping to address a young audience that has a complex relationship with screens and for whom TV is no longer central,” said France 4 editorial director Boris Razon, quoted in Le Monde (October 21). “The Vice News journalistic approach is bold and that is important in the era of mistrust vis-à-vis the media.”

Vice News produces original, to be mild, news reporting, generally available on YouTube channels. France is its first destination outside the US; Germany, Spain, Brazil, Mexico and Australia to follow. It’s been described as a cross of CNN and MTV. This year Vice News has raised US$500 million in venture funding.

Pay and VOD models excite broadcasters
“Classic TV and radio remains strongest”

This will be a good year, said German private broadcasters association VPRT in it annual year-end forecast. The big money is still with TV and radio advertising. Biggest growth, unsurprisingly, will accrue to pay platforms and the web.

VPRT sees TV advertising ending 2014 at €4.24 billion, up 2.7% against 2013, and radio ad revenues at €750 million, up 1.1%. Online and mobile display advertising is expected to grow 6% to a bit over €1.2 billion with tele-shopping revenues up 4% to €1.8 billion. (See VPRT presser here – in German)

TV advertising in Germany grew 2.2% in 2013 over the previous year. The 2014 forecast pales against the 2000 peak of €4.71 billion. Radio advertising in 2013 was 3.7% higher than 2012. “Classic TV and radio remains the strongest segments,” said VPRT market development director Frank Giersberg.

Streamed video ads online will grow to €244 million, up 22%, and revenues from streamed audio ads online should be up about 30%, to €10 million.

The shift from ad to subscriber revenue continues to mount in Germany. Pay-TV and video-on-demand subscriptions will bring in €2.3 billion this year; pay-TV revenue up 12% and VOD subscription up 18%.

Pay-TV had been considered moribund in Germany, if not exactly dead. Sky Deutschland has beat the drum for pay-TV and is currently in the process of being folded into UK pay-TV company BSkyB.  Subscription VOD has many holding their breath with all major German media houses entering that competition along with Netflix, Amazon and others. (See more on media in Germany here)

The VPRT forecasts are based on the considered opinions of broadcasting executives.

Digital TV too high risk, says publisher
No backing into the future

Of interest to publishers seeking new opportunities has long been the glow of the TV screen. The promise of big reach and big advertising, even brand extension, excites the executive office. And digital TV brought it all within reach.

Six months ago big Scandinavian media house Schibsted applied for and received a digital TV license in Sweden to be affiliated with big daily newspaper Aftonbladet, already operating a branded online TV channel. “This opens up exciting possibilities,” said publisher Jan Helin announcing the news in April.

That excitement faded. Last week the digital TV license was returned, with thanks. “We want to lead the trend rather than risk backing into the future,” said Aftonbladet TV director Jan Scherman in a statement, quoted by medievarlden.se (October 17). (See more about media in Sweden here)

“Since we got the permit last spring, the conditions for linear television have changed radically,” Mr. Scherman explained. “I have extensive experience in the television industry and have not experienced anything like it. Linear viewing behavior has now changed so fast… it is too high risk for a new TV provider to incur the costs.”

Previous weeks complete Tickle File

copyright ©2004-2014 ftm partners, unless otherwise noted Contact UsSponsor ftm